When first starting this class I was unsure of what to expect because of my unfamiliarity with research design and especially involving the topic of early childhood. During this course I have learned the process of research design and now understand the concepts of research which once seemed so complicated. For instance, narrowing a topic in to sub topics, learning to transform a research question in to a hypothesis, and choosing appropriate methods of which conduct a simulation project. I have learned that research derives from a comparison of people who are considered of the “norm”, with the intent to create change or govern behavior. I appreciate the regulations that have been placed on research of children in areas of ethics, consent and deciding if the benefit of research outweigh the risks. The challenges that I encountered were in deciding what method of research would appropriately fit my simulation. I found my self debating between a mixed method design and mufti method design of qualitative research. In order to decide the best method I attempted to learn as much as possible about the two methodological choices and compare ways that both of them would fit in to my research simulation. I decided using a mixed method design of both qualitative and quantitative data best fit because of because it would provide a accurate measurement of data and deep observations and discussions. I have learned that early child hood professionals who conduct research are especially valuable because they provide insight and standards in to the field for other professionals to build upon. I have also found a new respect for those conducting research who spend great lengths of time and dedication to seeking outcomes that add value and enhancement to the early childhood field.
